New Jersey law firm

The contested decision, the New Jersey law firm Company offered to pay VAT, income tax and penalties. The tax authority refers to the fact that the documents submitted in support of tax deductions and the reasonableness of the expenditures contained inaccurate information. Records of verification of posting cash and require the submission of documents drawn up before making a decision to conduct the examination. The act of checking the taxpayer is not handed. Has not been served with the screening decision. The review of materials testing and decision will be made by different persons. Decision on the audit results made out of time. Of the violations inspectors tried to refute the typos and technical errors. The head of the tax authority in considering the tax audit materials and the decision did not provide the taxpayer an opportunity to participate in the process of consideration of a tax audit. Costs of conducting business dinners in negotiations with contractors, including during trips to other cities, may be considered for tax purposes if they are documented.